AI CS Delivery: Division Table + CI Gate Cuts Quote from 250k to 120k
王中阳讲AI掘金 · 2026-10-17
Read original作者用AI员工处理重复文档与CRUD，人工负责核心RAG/权限/不可逆操作，并通过CI门禁强制分工，从而以12万报价交付原本外包25万的AI客服项目。
Business model
Solo developer uses AI workers for docs and CRUD, keeps RAG/permissions/irreversible writes for himself, and enforces rules via CI gate, quoting 120k for a system that traditional outsourcing would price at ~250k, with cash cost 20-30k.
Solo developer uses AI workers for docs and CRUD, keeps RAG/permissions/irreversible writes for himself, and enforces rules via CI gate, quoting 120k for a system that traditional outsourcing would price at ~250k, with cash cost 20-30k.
Workflow
- AI drafts docs and flowcharts
- Fill tasks.json per division table
- CI Go checker rejects write_op owned by AI
- AI generates code, human reviews core
Adaptation plan
Results are as reported by the original post author. Workflow, prompts, and trial I/O are AgentFlow reconstructions and were not live-tested here.
Starter prompt
Written by AgentFlow; not the original author’s prompt. Not independently deployed in Muse or Grok.
You are the delivery owner. Given the module list, output a JSON task list where each item has name, owner (human or ai), accept, write_op. Rule: irreversible writes (delete/payment/outbound message) must be owner=human. Then list risks needing human confirmation.
Running costs and pitfalls
Results are as reported by the original post author. Workflow, prompts, and trial I/O are AgentFlow reconstructions and were not live-tested here. No independent cost benchmark is available. Check subscriptions, permissions and external actions before running a workflow.