One question about ad spend, and Muse found $1,742 a week leaking
Dmitry KorzhovX (Twitter) · 2026-09-22
Read originalholy shit, @Muse just caught $1,742 a week leaking out of my ad account. I asked one question about my ad spend. It did everything else by itself.
Business model
From one question about ad spend, Muse reconciled Meta ads, the pixel and GA4, found 4 dead ads eating budget and a 4.1s mobile LCP, traced a lost trial event to a deploy, restored it, backfilled 4 days and deduped 194 double-counted purchases, then advised changes (author-reported).
The agent reconciles ad platform, pixel and analytics data, traces breaks to a bad deploy, restores tracking with approval, and advises budget changes.
Workflow
- Grant read access to the ad account, pixel and analytics; have the agent reconcile and report gaps.
- The agent locates waste and tracking breaks; fixes are proposed before any write.
- Review the recommendations, then change campaign settings.
Adaptation plan
Located waste is not saved money until campaigns change. Cross-platform attribution never matches perfectly. AgentFlow has not independently deployed this adaptation.
Starter prompt
Written by AgentFlow; not the original author’s prompt. Not independently deployed in Muse or Grok.
Start read-only: reconcile my ad data across the ad platform, the pixel and analytics - do the numbers match? List the discrepancies and the most likely waste sources with evidence. For any write action (restoring events, backfilling, deduping), propose the fix first and wait for my confirmation.
Running costs and pitfalls
Located waste is not saved money until campaigns change. Cross-platform attribution never matches perfectly. AgentFlow has not independently deployed this adaptation. No independent cost benchmark is available. Check subscriptions, permissions and external actions before running a workflow.